This decline in popularity has become the subject of countless blogs, news reports, books, and symposiums and has classical

If one looks at the current record sales for classical music, the numbers are depressing. Compared to what the industry produced from 1950 to 1975, the numbers today are practically negligible. However, going beyond the major record labels, it is clear that classical music sales are actually booming. Since the creation of Apple’s iTunes in 2003, the sales of classical music have risen significantly. In fact, they reportedly accounted for twelve percent of the one billion tracks sold by iTunes in the first three years. In a recent interview with Alex Ross, a music critic from The New Yorker, Chris Bell, the director of worldwide product and music marketing at iTunes said, “iTunes is a safe place to try classical music. It is easy to sample and the buying is low-risk.” Perhaps this is why the sales have been so high. First time listeners and buyers are able to peruse iTunes’ vast selection from the comfort of their own home and buy songs one track at a time rather than investing their money into an entire CD, which they may end up not even enjoying.
While iTunes is a huge source for classical music and a main reason for the surge in sales, other sources are available for downloading as well. One of the largest online resources can be found at Naxos.com. Naxos Records, one of the biggest classical music recording labels was created in the eighties by Klaus Heymann. Heymann (seen to the right), who started his company at about the same time as the creation of the CD, saw an opportunity to profit off of recordings of mainstream classical repertory. In the early years, he relied on low priced ensembles that offered poor recordings. The business was not very lucrative, and he was not bringing

Not only has the Internet helped to boost sales of the actual music, but it has also increased ticket sales for concerts. In the past few years, many major newspapers such as the New York Times and magazines such as Guardian Unlimited have argued against this claim, saying that “the concert hall is in crisis” and pointing out that season subscriptions for concert halls have plummeted. However, last-minute tickets sales have risen ten percent in the past decade. In fact, according to Matthew Westphal from Playbill Arts, “The [Metropolitan Opera] sold 83.9% of available tickets in 2006-07, up from 76.8% in 2005-06.” Before that, “figures had slipped every year since the 90.8% reached in 2000-01.” The most probable reason for this change in trend is that families have grown busier, and their habits have shifted. Many do not want to invest in season tickets where they have to commit to performances months in advance. Also, the Internet has led to a rise of first time concertgoers. People now have unlimited access to performance reviews, online radios, and streaming audio of classical music performances. They can hear samplings of the music before committing the money to buy the tickets. On top of that, there are scores of classical music blogs, such as chicagoclassicalmusic.org and the blog written by Jessica Duchen, a music journalist for The Independent. Each of these blogs, along with the countless others like these, get hundreds and sometimes thousands of hits a day, and they allow performers, composers, critics, conductors, or simply just classical music fans to get their voices heard, have immediate impact, and in some cases, to have some free advertising for themselves. Never could this have been done before the dawn of the Internet.
Although classical music has a history of riding the wave of popularity through new media in the past, starting with records, then cassette tapes, then CDs, there is no denying that the Internet has created for it a new awareness. No type of medium for obtaining classical music has ever been in existence that is as far reaching as the Internet. However, we cannot attribute all of the success to the Internet. In the words of Alex Ross, “classical music is, in fact, saving itself; Internet activity is merely the most immediately visible evidence of its refusal to fade away.” Nevertheless, fans of classical music will take this as a victory. This old, beautiful art form not only is not dying, but it looks like it will be here to stay.
1 comment:
I think your topic is extremely significant and riveting. Moreover, your introductory paragraph works particularly well because you draw the reader in with a nostalgic, idyllic tone of the "good old days" and then sharply juxtapose it with the harsh realities of today.However, you wait to introduce your argument that the death of music has not actually occurred,rather people are misinterpreting the data, until the third paragraph. The unexpected twist of events works well, though. Moreover, I can really relate to the paragraph in which you mention i tunes as a safe medium through which to explore the realm of classical music. I myself am very much a listener of classical music and operas. More often than not, when I go to purchase CD's I am overwhelmed by the vast selection of classical music. I am put off, as I am sure many buyers are, by the chance that my pick could prove to be a bad one. I had not thought to use i tunes to prevent this, but will certainly make not of it next time I have a hankering for some classical music. Back to your blog,I was wondering why you thought that many more first time concert-goers are attending these shows. Is it perhaps because classical music is more accessible now with radio stations devoted strictly to this genre like k.Mozart? As you can see, I really enjoyed your blog, however, I do have some constructive criticism to offer. Your opening sentence, "Everyone has heard the rumors floating around in the past few decades reporting the death of classical music or at least of its failing health" could be re-worked to make it more effective. As the opening sentence, it is vitally important that you draw the reader in. Moreover, you contradict yourself. In the first paragraph you say that ticket sales have decreased, yet later on you argue that they have actually increased. This was somewhat confusing. Lastly, you fail to link your cited evidence back to its original text. Though this is a minor improvement, it will do a lot to boost your credibility. Overall, great post!
Post a Comment